Performance Data on Water Jet Eductors

This supplement should be used in conjunction with S&K Bulletin 2M which describes the construction, operation, and application of Schutte & Koerting Water Jet Eductors (Ejectors).

Bulletin 2M also contains information on available types, sizes and dimensions. This supplement contains capacity data. If you do not have a copy of Bulletin 2M, request one.

For capacity data on the types of eductors offered, refer to the following index.

page index
fig. 264 & 265
fig. 258 & 268

Table 1. Suction Capacities of Water Jet Eductors, Types 264, 266 and 212 – 1 Inch Size Only.

To determine capacities for sizes other than 1 inch, multiply these capacities by the proper capacity ratio factor noted in Tables 2 or 3 (for PVC, KYNAR, or Polypropylene Eductors).

table 1

Table 2. Relative Capacities of Water Jet Eductors, Types 264, 266 and 212.

table 2

Table 3. Relative Capacities of Water Jet Eductor Made from KYNAR, Polypropylene or PVC, Fig. 264.

table 3

Table 265-1. 1” Fig. 265LM Water Jet Eductor Performance (Suction Capacity) (+10 thru -5 Ps)

Table 265-1

Table 265-2. 1” Fig. 265LM Water Jet Eductor Performance (Suction Capacity) (-10 thru -25 Ps)

Table 265-2

Table 265-3. Fig. 265LM Water Jet Eductor Capacity Factor

Table 265-3

Table 265-8. 1” Fig. 265LL & Fig. 265LH Water Jet Eductor Performance (+10 thru -5 hs)

Table 265-8

Table 265-9. 1” Fig. 265LL & Fig. 265LH Water Jet Eductor Performance (-10 thru -25 hs)

Table 265-9

Table 265-10. Fig. 265LL & Fig. 265LH Water Jet Eductor Capacity Factor

Table 265-10

Fig. 265 Water Jet Eductor Selection Procedures

  1. Locate suction lift (Ps) on Table 265-1 & 265-2 located on page 3 and 4 closest to requirement.
  2. In that section of the chart locate the discharge head (P2).
  3. Read across the table to the column representing the available operating pressure shown at the top of the chart.
  4. This value will represent the suction flow volume in (gpm).
  5. By following the column to the bottom of the page, this value will represent the operating flow in (GPM).
  6. To determine actual unit size, divide the required suction flow by the suction flow obtained from the chart. Qs required/Qs calculated = Capacity Factor
  7. Refer to the Capacity factor in Table 265-3 located at the bottom of page 4. Choose the unit size with the capacity factor closest to the value determined in step 6. For capacities that fall between the factors in Table 265-2 choose the larger size unit.

Fig. 265 Water Jet Eductor Performance

Fig. 265

Fig. 265 Liquid Handling

Fig. 265

*Note: Sizing information is based on water. If liquids are other than water please refer to “Determination of Operating Conditions for Fluids other than Water” on this page.

*Determination of Operating Conditions for Fluids other than Water

The following corrections are necessary to convert the above liquid to a water equivalent

Note: For viscosity over 100 centipoise please contact the factory.

Table 4. Capacities of Automatic Water Jet Eductor, Fig. 2645 – 1 Inch Size Only.

To determine capacities for sizes other than 1 inch, multiply these capacities by the proper capacity ratio factor noted in Table 5.

table 4

Table 6. Suction Capacities, Pressure Data, and Motive Liquid Flows of S&K Mixing Eductor, Fig. 241, in Typical Applications. Table Applies to Selected Standard Sizes.

Note: Fig. 241 Mixing Eductors are built on special order for specific operating conditions. The table above is indicative of what is being accomplished in certain representative jobs. For capacity characteristics for your operation, please contact our engineers.

table 6

Table 5. Relative Capacities of Automatic Water Jet Eductor, Fig. 2645.

NOTE: For total discharge capacity, add suction and motive capacities.

table 5

Table 7. Capacities of Tank Mixing Eductor, Fig. 258.

table 7

Chart 8. Selection Chart for Determining the Number of Fig. 268 Eductor Required for Proper Mixing.

Note: In order to select the number of eductors required, the volume of the tank in gallons should be divided by the number of minutes estimated for complete turnover. This rate, in gpm, divided by four will give the motive liquid flow requirement of a standard Fig. 268 Eductor. From the chart and the available operating pressure, the number of eductors required can be selected. For good practice, a minimum pressure drop of 20 psi should be maintained between the eductor inlet and the static pressure at the bottom of the tank.

table 8

Table 268. Capacities of Tank Mixing Eductor, Fig. 268.

Table 268

Table 224-12. Capacities of Water Jet Sand and Mud Eductor, Fig. 224 – 3 Inch Size Only.

To determine capacities for sizes other than 3 inch, multiply these capacities by the proper capacity ratio factor noted in Table 13.

Table 224-12

Table 224-13. Relative Capacities of Sand and Mud Eductor, Fig. 224.

Table 224-13

Table 9. Suction Capacities and Water Consumptions of Hopper-Equipped Eductor, Fig. 254 – 1.5 Inch Size Only.

To determine capacities for sizes other than 1.5 inch, multiply these capacities by the proper capacity ratio factor noted in Table 10.

table 9

*Based on using approximately 10% motive water through wash-down nozzles.

Note: Fig. 254 Eductors are built on special order for specific operating conditions. The table above is indicative only of what can be accomplished under certain conditions. For capacity characteristics for your operation, please contact our engineers.

Table 11. Typical Materials Handled by Hopper-Equipped Eductor, Fig. 254.

Many more can be handled effectively.

table 11

Table 10. Relative Capacities of Hopper-Equipped
Eductor, Fig. 254.

table 10

Chart 254. Performance Summary of 1 1/2” Hopper-
Equipped Eductor, Fig. 254.

Chart 254

Chart 267. Performance Summary of 1” Hopper-Equipped Eductor, Fig. 267.

Chart 267

Table 267-1. Estimated Entrainment Capacities for 1” Size Hopper-Equipped Eductor, Fig. 267.

(For capacities for other sizes, multiply by factor given in table of relative capacites, below.)

Table 267-1

NOTE: Above based on 5 psig discharge pressure

Table 267-2. Relative Capacities of Hopper-Equipped Eductor, Fig. 267

Table 267-2

Nomograph for Determining Approximate Performance Characteristics for Fig. 222, Fig. 242, Fig. 235, and Fig. 222 Portable Water Jet Eductors.

(This nomograph is also suitable for approximate sizing of other types as well).

Fig. 222

NOTE: In using the nomograph in connection with an application where the motive liquid is the greater in volume of two liquids, Fig. 242 Eductors are generally used. In applications where the suction fluid is greater, Fig. 264, Fig. 222 and Fig. 235 Eductors are generally used. Approximate sizes can be determined by selecting eductors with pipe connections appropriate to pipe sizes in Step 7 of Sample Procedure on page 12.

Performance Characteristics of standard and general purpose Water Jet Eductors can be determined from the tabular data included with the description of such eductors (Fig. 264, Fig. 224).

The following data and procedures can be used to determine approximate performance characteristics for those eductors which are individually designed to meet specific conditions. Using this procedure along with the nomograph above, the reader can determine whether or not an S&K eductor will perform a given job economically.

It should be noted, however, that the sizes of eductors noted in this bulletin are the sizes commonly manufactured by the company. Since it is possible to design, build, and supply other sizes, if conditions necessitate, it would be wise to submit your requirements to S&K before deciding that an eductor cannot do your job.

The results obtained from the procedure which follows are approximations. Final calculations should be made by Schutte & Koerting engineers who will then recommend to you the proper type and size eductor required to perform a given operation.

Sample Procedure

1. DETERMINE THE SUCTION HEAD

Suction Head = average suction lift during emptying of tank. (If suction fluid is not water, correct head to feet of water.) (Quantities have a negative sign because of the location of the datum plane.)

2. DETERMINE THE DISCHARGE HEAD

Assume a specific gravity for the discharge mixture if suction fluid is not water.

Using a sp. gr. of 0.93 (an average between the sp. gr. of Toluene and water) for discharge mixture, then:

3. CALCULATE THE TOTAL HEAD AND THE TOTAL OPERATING HEAD

4. DETERMINE THE NET POSITIVE SUCTION HEAD (NPSH)

(In this example suction head is a negative quantity because of the location of the datum plane. The governing vapor pressure is motive or suction whichever is higher.)

5. TO DETERMINE THE PERFORMANCE RATIO

6. CALCULATE SUCTION FLOW TO EMPTY TANK

If this calculated sp. gr. of the mixture does not closely agree with assumed sp. gr. of the mixture (Step No. 2), the approximation should be repeated using the final specific gravity.

7. DETERMINE HEAD LOSS DUE TO PIPE FRICTION

Using the final discharge flow approximation, refer to the chart below and calculate head loss for the appropriate pipe sizes. Expected head loss should be added to static heads and eductor recalculated.

8. USE PIPE CONNECTIONS AS GUIDE TO APPROXIMATE SIZES

Approximate sizes can be determined by selecting eductors with pipe connections appropriate to pipe sizes in Step 7.

Data Required and Definition of Terms Used in Sample Procedure

1.) Total Head (in ft. of fluid flowing): Total difference between suction head and discharge head as measured from the level of the suction liquid to the level of discharge required, including pipe friction.

2.) Total Operating Head (in ft. of fluid flowing): Total difference between the motive and suction heads – or, the total difference between operating pressure and suction head.

3.) Net Positive Suction Head (NPSH): The head available at the centerline of the eductor to move and accelerate suction liquid entering the eductor mixing chamber, (NPSH is the difference between the suction pressure and atmospheric pressure corrected for the vapor pressure of the motive or suction fluid, whichever is higher.)

4.) Performance Ratio: Ratio of suction flow to motive flow in lb. of entrained liquid per lb. of motive liquid.

This chart is based on Williams and Hazen Formula using a constant of 1.00 for ordinary Wrought Iron Pipe. For friction loss in other types of pipe multiply the chart reading by the factors below:

  1. Very smooth and straight Wrought Iron, Brass, Tin, Copper and Lead Pipe……………………………………0.54
  1. Ordinary Straight Brass, Tin, Copper and Lead Pipe…………0.62
  1. Smooth New Wrought Iron Pipe……………………………………0.71
  1. Fairly Smooth New Wrought Iron Pipe and Rubber Lines Hose..0.84
  1. Ordinary Wrought Iron Pipe….1.00
  1. Medium Old Wrought Iron Pipe and Linen Fire Hose…………….1.22
  1. Old Wrought Iron Pipe………….1.52
  1. Very Rough Pipe…………………2.58
  1. Badly Tuberculated Pipe………5.46